Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Beautiful Babies

"Love me the way I am!"
“Designer babies” is a term used by the media to describe choosing the characteristics of babies before birth. In scientific terms, it is selecting and modifying genes for desirable traits. This means that they can screen for diseases in the embryos and only implant the healthy embryos into the mother, creating only healthy babies.

Sounds good right? To scientists, yes, but there is controversy in the media. There are people who stand against this because of ethical concerns. The fear is that we will take this too far, and eventually start choosing the traits of children for cosmetic purposes rather than just medical.

Yes, one day it could be possible to decide everything from your child’s eye colour to their brain capacity. Today, however, we can’t do more than screen for heritable diseases. This process is called Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). This is done in embryos created through InVitro Fertilization, basically where an egg and sperm from the parents are taken to a lab and fertilized there, then implanted in the mother’s womb. During PGD, these embryos are screened for certain diseases, and those affected are not implanted.

To those who feel it is wrong to choose the traits of a baby, making them picture-perfect, those who think that in choosing their DNA we’re treating them more like dolls than human beings, I agree. We would be tampering with life, with the gift of a child. But, to those people, I would like to say that you need not worry about that! Not yet, at least. Currently the option to choose a child’s sex, let alone eye colour, is not even available. It’s possible, but not 100% effective, and nowhere near affordable.


Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis is most commonly suggested for couples with known heritable diseases, or older couples whose children would also run the risk of genetic defects. Personally, I don’t see the unethical aspects of this process. Couples who may not have wanted children, because of the risk of diseases being passed on, can now ensure a healthy child. People who would have had an abortion in light of bad diagnosis during pregnancy, could prevent this, and a life could be saved.

Yes, people could abuse this technology if science allows us to choose the cosmetic traits of our child. It is wrong to put a child at risk for superficial reasons, and I am completely against this. But protesting PDG because of these possibilities is like protesting medical school because you are against cosmetic surgery. Many people are against it because they think it is an unnecessary risk, a waste of money, or simply unethical. But even these people cannot protest research on the human anatomy and practice of safe surgical alterations. The ones that allow us to save people with injuries or illnesses, as well as make cosmetic procedures possible. This is the same with the concept of PDG. Currently, all this procedure does is allow us to prevent babies from diseases before pregnancy, and save lives.

♀      ♂      ♀      ♂     ♀     ♂      ♀     ♂







♀      ♂      ♀      ♂     ♀     ♂      ♀     ♂
Interested in this topic? Wanna learn more? Want another opinion?
Check out:

What's Wrong With My Baby? by Claudia

The Ideal Baby...It Could Be Yours! by Dora

(You'll find my comments there, too.)

10 comments:

  1. No matter what, scientist will keep doing research on IVF and technology will improve greatly, in ways that we would have never thought it would happen. PGD is a good option to those with inheritable diseases, but I still stand on my point that no matter what, there's still the inevitable. But, PGD may not be completely developed, there may still be room for improvement, so what if something goes wrong, and perhaps, the child gets another disease. What if something unexpected happens, what if there are some effects on the baby, there are alot of questions yet to be answered, and I think that these technologies are in the process of testing it out, on humans, and if there is something wrong, then they improve from the error. What I think, (and in buddhism views -> all life is suffering) is that healthy child or not, that child is still yours. If God wanted us to all live without suffering, or sickness...then he wouldn't have allowed viruses to roam around on earth. But in the end, the choice of IVF, PGD is in the hands of the parents, and that, I have no say on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Erica!

    I think that it's nice to have an invention to determine whether or not a baby will be born with some sort of disease, however, I don't think that abolishing the life is the right thing to do. Sometimes the tests might not be as accurate. I think that parents should let nature take its course and not take PGD. I do agree with you Erica that babies should be "loved the way they are."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Erica, you made some really strong points, PGD is nice for the knowledge of genetics and everything, but I think it's unfair still. Think about it, the egg that is fertilized and carries the disease is not implanted and is disposed of, you realize you're throwing away a human's life. I feel like nobody has the right to judge who should live and die, everybody should be given the chance to live. It's like the time when Pope john Paul II spoke about the "right to life" were he said abortion was wrong because we shouldn't be throwing away lives. Look at it this way, for a child with a disease, or just anybody going through a hard time, God wouldn't have put you in that situation if He didn't know you could deal with it. Everything happens for a reason and we have to accept that, but ultimately the choice of going through PGD is up to the parents, if they choose to then so be it, but I feel everybody has the right to life and PGD is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, so I guess we don't have to comment back on these blogs, but this is really interesting so I will. :)

    Marc. Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis is a way to screen for heritable diseases. Many of them fatal. I understand your point about disposing of fertilized eggs. But if an embryo has a fatal disease, the chances are the child will die in a later stage in life. Unlike abortion, PGD is not "taking human lives," it's the other option. They don't pick the embryo they like and decide "This one deserves to live." They pick the one that is most likely to live! It's not about the perfect child like the media is making it out to be, it's about a healthy child.

    Dora. "If God wanted us to live without suffering and diseases...he wouldn't have allowed viruses to roam the earth." That's an interesting point; that we're messing with the way of life. But it's kind of like with evil, right? God didn't put evil on earth for kicks. At least I don't think so. But we fight evil everyday - crime and war and stuff. For good; to help people. Well, isn't that what we're doing, only differently? Another idea: maybe He would want this. After all, if we weren't meant to discover this stuff...he wouldn't have made us this smart. ;)

    Claudia. I do agree that abolishing life is wrong. And you're right, there could be mistakes, both in PGD and during pregnancy. But in many cases, unfortunately, there are still people who would abort a sick child. And there are many still births. I guess, for me, if it's the choice between discarding an embryo with a disease, or letting a developed child die in the womb - or even killing it - I would take the option of PGD.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe that PGD, and IVF, is something that should not be considered. It is great to know that us humans have increased our knowledge about genetics and we are constantly learning, although I think a child should be loved unconditionally and I agree with what you have said that babies should be "loved the way they are." It is important that we are sure not to get to far into the science and really think about the babies we are destroying.
    I really agree with what Dora has said, that "If God wanted us to all live without suffering, or sickness...then he wouldn't have allowed viruses to roam around on earth."
    It is important that although our knowledge in science is increasing we should remember that it is important we consider the life of every human being.

    ReplyDelete
  6. the ideas and points you touched upon are very important, and well put. I enjoyed how your blog was layed out. it would of been good to go more in depth when discussing both the pros and cons of this technique, yet overall great job. i liked how you commented on your blog to discuss what other were stating it shows the you have a great understanding and opinion toward this topic and i agree with what you stated. i find this technique to be very helpful if used properly and not misused. but that only makes me wonder when is it enough? also you stated that God would of wanted us to know about this technique. but if you think about the story of Adam and Eve. God did not want them to hold his knowledge and warned them from eating from the forbidden tree. now we can compare this to the "designer babies" as we continue to evolve we are learning about things we did not dream of knowing a long time ago. yet as we obtain all this knowledge when will it be enough? "Designer babies" might seem harmless now but if this idea is wide spread it can hold many disadvantages beyond what we can predict.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. First of all, the format and context of your blog is very easy to follow and interesting to read. Great job :)

    Scientists just don't know when to quit. I understand that it is their job to discover new things in life, but what is the point of being able to change the look of their baby besides the fact that they will grow up to look good? This will just end up as a money making campaign. I don't get why people are so obsessed with blue eyes or straight hair and whatnot. Even the thought of trying to alter a baby's personality is just too over the top. Thank goodness they havn't found a way to do that yet, as I do not know what would happen to our society. I give all my support to the procedures that help cure a baby's illness, but that is about it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey! I felt like your blog about designer babies was informative and interesting. I strongly agree with you when you say how it's wrong for people to use this research for superficial reasons. I feel like this type of research shouldn't be used to better the cosmetic looks of a child, but to help the child with the medical problems that might occur in their life. Some people in the world are so caught up with what the media portray's as "perfection" that they lose sight of what is really important.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Erica. Your post on PGD and 'designer babies' was very well done. I agree with your reasoning for using this technology for couples with existing hereditary diseases. This technology can save many lives and reduce the amount of unneccessary abortions due to complications with the fetus. I also agree that using this for cosmetic reasons to produce aesthetically pleasing children is unethical and completely unneccessary.

    Again, it good post with great points!

    ReplyDelete