Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Sustain or Industrialize?

That is the question.


A question that the agricultural industry is faced with; and it becomes more demanding with the growing population, and the looming threat of global warming. What it comes down to, really, is convenience and profit versus health and the environment. Industrial agriculture is clearly the more efficient and profitable method of farming. With it, we rely on a few productive breeds of livestock and crops.


Only a select few crops are grown year after year to reduce production costs, thus creating a higher profit for the farmers. Growing certain, more productive crops in bulk is efficient, but it reduces the diversity of plants. The plants that are grown tend to get attacked by pests and weeds due to lack of crop rotation, and so more pesticides and fertilizers are needed. These chemicals go into the food that we consume, and run off into rivers and streams, causing harm to humans and the environment.


On farms where industrial agriculture is practiced, they have huge amounts of livestock. Like with the crops, they are farmed for speed, quantity, and profit, rather than quality. Animals are genetically modified to be fatter, and therefore worth more meat. These specialized animals are kept in filthy, crowded conditions, and are susceptible to disease. This is potentially harmful to us, and cruel to the animals. The most common example of this would be chickens. They are grown to unnatural sizes and so many of them are crowded in tiny spaces on these farms.












Industrial agriculture causes pollution and soil destruction, it consumes large amounts of water and energy and uses many chemicals that polute the water. It is cruel to animals, and it will have a disastrous long term effect on our environment and its biodiversity.
Why then, do we do it? Profit, of course, why else? The cheap products brought about by industrial agriculture benefits the farmer and the consumer – but only from a financial point of view. This is not a good enough reason.

Some have questioned if agriculture is going to be able to keep up with the steady increase in population. With the speed at which industrial agriculture produces, we are, in fact, overproducing some foods. The problem is not producing more food for today’s population, but sustaining our resources so that we can feed populations of the future, with natural products, grown from uncontaminated soil and water.

This is where sustainable agriculture comes in, the readily available alternative. The number of ways to produce and consume sustainable foods continues growing. Sustainable agriculture does not use the methods of industrial agriculture, such as genetically modifying plants and animals. Instead, plants are grown naturally, reducing the risk of contamination and using less harmful chemicals in the making. Sustainable techniques include using natural pesticides and no-till cultivation to prevent soil erosion, all benefiting the environment. The short term health benefits and long-term environmental advantages, outweigh the immediate convenience of industrial farming. When it comes to what we consume, and what we put into the environment, quality, not quantity, should be our first priority.  


Sources:






The more you know...!
Click on these links to see what these people had to say.

The foods we eat could kill tons of other species!

Stop Before It's Too Late!






Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Beautiful Babies

"Love me the way I am!"
“Designer babies” is a term used by the media to describe choosing the characteristics of babies before birth. In scientific terms, it is selecting and modifying genes for desirable traits. This means that they can screen for diseases in the embryos and only implant the healthy embryos into the mother, creating only healthy babies.

Sounds good right? To scientists, yes, but there is controversy in the media. There are people who stand against this because of ethical concerns. The fear is that we will take this too far, and eventually start choosing the traits of children for cosmetic purposes rather than just medical.

Yes, one day it could be possible to decide everything from your child’s eye colour to their brain capacity. Today, however, we can’t do more than screen for heritable diseases. This process is called Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). This is done in embryos created through InVitro Fertilization, basically where an egg and sperm from the parents are taken to a lab and fertilized there, then implanted in the mother’s womb. During PGD, these embryos are screened for certain diseases, and those affected are not implanted.

To those who feel it is wrong to choose the traits of a baby, making them picture-perfect, those who think that in choosing their DNA we’re treating them more like dolls than human beings, I agree. We would be tampering with life, with the gift of a child. But, to those people, I would like to say that you need not worry about that! Not yet, at least. Currently the option to choose a child’s sex, let alone eye colour, is not even available. It’s possible, but not 100% effective, and nowhere near affordable.


Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis is most commonly suggested for couples with known heritable diseases, or older couples whose children would also run the risk of genetic defects. Personally, I don’t see the unethical aspects of this process. Couples who may not have wanted children, because of the risk of diseases being passed on, can now ensure a healthy child. People who would have had an abortion in light of bad diagnosis during pregnancy, could prevent this, and a life could be saved.

Yes, people could abuse this technology if science allows us to choose the cosmetic traits of our child. It is wrong to put a child at risk for superficial reasons, and I am completely against this. But protesting PDG because of these possibilities is like protesting medical school because you are against cosmetic surgery. Many people are against it because they think it is an unnecessary risk, a waste of money, or simply unethical. But even these people cannot protest research on the human anatomy and practice of safe surgical alterations. The ones that allow us to save people with injuries or illnesses, as well as make cosmetic procedures possible. This is the same with the concept of PDG. Currently, all this procedure does is allow us to prevent babies from diseases before pregnancy, and save lives.

♀      ♂      ♀      ♂     ♀     ♂      ♀     ♂







♀      ♂      ♀      ♂     ♀     ♂      ♀     ♂
Interested in this topic? Wanna learn more? Want another opinion?
Check out:

What's Wrong With My Baby? by Claudia

The Ideal Baby...It Could Be Yours! by Dora

(You'll find my comments there, too.)

Thursday, September 30, 2010


SAVE THE RAINFOREST!


 
There are millions of differents species of plants and animals on Earth, and still so many remain undiscovered. Of the known plants and animals, it is estimated that 50% live in the tropical rainforests.

With warm temperatures year round, and near daily rainfall, the rainforest has the ideal conditions for sustaining. Thus, rainforests contain the most biodiversity, and provide us with the widest range of resources of all ecosystems.

The Maues Marmoset

Rainforests are home to countless millions of the most amazing species of plants and animals. Some with millions in their population, other with only dozens. The Maues Marmoset, a tiny monkey the size of your hand lives entirely in a few square miles of the Amazon rainforest. Here you’ll also leopards, jaguars, apes, toucans, billions of insects, chameleons, poison-dart frogs, sloths, fish, the fourteen-foot boa, birds, river dolphins, manatee, and humans…To name a few.


The Jaguar
 


The Tree Frog



  Many of these species have not been able to adapt quickly enough to the rapid changes that humans are making to their environment, taking resources unsparingly and giving nothing back. An average of 35 rainforest species becomes extinct every day. We are losing rare, even undiscovered animals and plants that are used for medicinal cures, more than 99% of which have yet to be tested. Tropical rainforest cover only about 7% of Earth’s land surface, yet tens of millions of acres are being destroyed every year. Our rainforests are disappearing.

The Rainforest Conservation Fund (RCF) is an all-volunteer, non-profit organization founded in 1988. Their aim is to protect the rainforests, using practical solutions, and often by teaming up with other organizations. Some of the threats that they are fighting include logging, clearing for farms and ranches, over-hunting and -fishing, charcoal production, mining and exploration, road building and industrial plants, and oil extraction.

Some of the RCF projects include work around the Tamshiyacu Tahuayo Conservation Area, in the Amazon basin of northeast Peru. Here they fight for the animals as well as for the rights of the people who live in parts of the Amazon, whose homes are being threatened by industrial plans. They want to protect the reserves around the Tahuayo River. They are also working with the Universidad de Golfito Foundation in the last remaining tropical rainforest in Costa Rica, which has become too small to ensure the long term survival of its endangered species. They intend long-term to purchase 5000 hectares of this rainforest in order to protect more of it from being taken down.

For all the reasons listed above – the beauty and importance of our tropical rainforests – the work of the RCF is very significant. One of the most effective things they are doing is raising awareness, because the loss of our rainforests is everyone’s business. We will all be affected, and more people need to take a stand against the destruction of our natural ecosystems.

___________________________





Also check out:

The Second Incision: Coral Reefs


Saving the Penguins!

(You'll find my comments there, too)